Review



flow cytometry sony id7000 spectral cell analyzer  (Sony)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Sony flow cytometry sony id7000 spectral cell analyzer
    Flow Cytometry Sony Id7000 Spectral Cell Analyzer, supplied by Sony, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/flow cytometry sony id7000 spectral cell analyzer/product/Sony
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    flow cytometry sony id7000 spectral cell analyzer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    Sony flow cytometry sony id7000 spectral cell analyzer
    Flow Cytometry Sony Id7000 Spectral Cell Analyzer, supplied by Sony, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/flow cytometry sony id7000 spectral cell analyzer/product/Sony
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    flow cytometry sony id7000 spectral cell analyzer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Tree Star Inc spectral flow-cytometry data preprocessing
    Spectral Flow Cytometry Data Preprocessing, supplied by Tree Star Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/spectral flow-cytometry data preprocessing/product/Tree Star Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spectral flow-cytometry data preprocessing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    Cytek Biosciences aurora spectral flow cytometry
    a Tumor growth in IgMi mice. IgMi or C57BL/6 mice were s.c. implanted with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Tumor growth curves were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b , c Shown are frequencies of GC B cells ( b ) in IgMi ( N = 9) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice and frequencies of plasmablast ( c ) in IgMi ( N = 8) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice in draining LNs on day 7 post-inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. d Analysis of tumor growth in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 26) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 30) implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. e , f Tumor sizes and weights on day 20 post-inoculation (DPI 20). In ( f ) N = 7 for Prdm1 fl/fl and 8 for Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups. g , h Representative flow <t>cytometry</t> plots and frequencies of GC B cells (( g ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 7 vs 7, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 9 vs 9) or plasma cells (( h ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 2 vs 2, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 7 vs 7) in LNs on day 7, 18, 27 post inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. i , j Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating IFNγ + CD8 T cells ( i ) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells ( j ) from Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 6) on DPI 7. k , l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating exhausted CD8 T cells (( k ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 7)) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells (( l ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 12) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9)) on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data ( b , c and g – l ) were from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , c , f – l ) represents the value obtained in an independent mouse. Bars are presented as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , c , f , g and i – l ), Two-way ANOVA ( a , d , g and h ) and exact p value shown in figures. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Aurora Spectral Flow Cytometry, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/aurora spectral flow cytometry/product/Cytek Biosciences
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    aurora spectral flow cytometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    FluoroFinder spectral flow cytometry antibody panel
    a Tumor growth in IgMi mice. IgMi or C57BL/6 mice were s.c. implanted with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Tumor growth curves were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b , c Shown are frequencies of GC B cells ( b ) in IgMi ( N = 9) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice and frequencies of plasmablast ( c ) in IgMi ( N = 8) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice in draining LNs on day 7 post-inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. d Analysis of tumor growth in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 26) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 30) implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. e , f Tumor sizes and weights on day 20 post-inoculation (DPI 20). In ( f ) N = 7 for Prdm1 fl/fl and 8 for Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups. g , h Representative flow <t>cytometry</t> plots and frequencies of GC B cells (( g ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 7 vs 7, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 9 vs 9) or plasma cells (( h ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 2 vs 2, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 7 vs 7) in LNs on day 7, 18, 27 post inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. i , j Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating IFNγ + CD8 T cells ( i ) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells ( j ) from Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 6) on DPI 7. k , l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating exhausted CD8 T cells (( k ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 7)) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells (( l ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 12) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9)) on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data ( b , c and g – l ) were from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , c , f – l ) represents the value obtained in an independent mouse. Bars are presented as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , c , f , g and i – l ), Two-way ANOVA ( a , d , g and h ) and exact p value shown in figures. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Spectral Flow Cytometry Antibody Panel, supplied by FluoroFinder, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/spectral flow cytometry antibody panel/product/FluoroFinder
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spectral flow cytometry antibody panel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Sony spectral flow cytometry
    a Tumor growth in IgMi mice. IgMi or C57BL/6 mice were s.c. implanted with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Tumor growth curves were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b , c Shown are frequencies of GC B cells ( b ) in IgMi ( N = 9) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice and frequencies of plasmablast ( c ) in IgMi ( N = 8) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice in draining LNs on day 7 post-inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. d Analysis of tumor growth in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 26) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 30) implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. e , f Tumor sizes and weights on day 20 post-inoculation (DPI 20). In ( f ) N = 7 for Prdm1 fl/fl and 8 for Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups. g , h Representative flow <t>cytometry</t> plots and frequencies of GC B cells (( g ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 7 vs 7, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 9 vs 9) or plasma cells (( h ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 2 vs 2, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 7 vs 7) in LNs on day 7, 18, 27 post inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. i , j Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating IFNγ + CD8 T cells ( i ) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells ( j ) from Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 6) on DPI 7. k , l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating exhausted CD8 T cells (( k ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 7)) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells (( l ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 12) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9)) on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data ( b , c and g – l ) were from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , c , f – l ) represents the value obtained in an independent mouse. Bars are presented as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , c , f , g and i – l ), Two-way ANOVA ( a , d , g and h ) and exact p value shown in figures. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Spectral Flow Cytometry, supplied by Sony, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/spectral flow cytometry/product/Sony
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spectral flow cytometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    Cytek Biosciences spectral flow cytometry analysis
    a Tumor growth in IgMi mice. IgMi or C57BL/6 mice were s.c. implanted with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Tumor growth curves were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b , c Shown are frequencies of GC B cells ( b ) in IgMi ( N = 9) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice and frequencies of plasmablast ( c ) in IgMi ( N = 8) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice in draining LNs on day 7 post-inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. d Analysis of tumor growth in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 26) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 30) implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. e , f Tumor sizes and weights on day 20 post-inoculation (DPI 20). In ( f ) N = 7 for Prdm1 fl/fl and 8 for Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups. g , h Representative flow <t>cytometry</t> plots and frequencies of GC B cells (( g ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 7 vs 7, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 9 vs 9) or plasma cells (( h ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 2 vs 2, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 7 vs 7) in LNs on day 7, 18, 27 post inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. i , j Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating IFNγ + CD8 T cells ( i ) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells ( j ) from Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 6) on DPI 7. k , l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating exhausted CD8 T cells (( k ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 7)) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells (( l ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 12) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9)) on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data ( b , c and g – l ) were from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , c , f – l ) represents the value obtained in an independent mouse. Bars are presented as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , c , f , g and i – l ), Two-way ANOVA ( a , d , g and h ) and exact p value shown in figures. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Spectral Flow Cytometry Analysis, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/spectral flow cytometry analysis/product/Cytek Biosciences
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spectral flow cytometry analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Sony flow cytometry sony sa3800 spectral cell analyser
    a Tumor growth in IgMi mice. IgMi or C57BL/6 mice were s.c. implanted with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Tumor growth curves were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b , c Shown are frequencies of GC B cells ( b ) in IgMi ( N = 9) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice and frequencies of plasmablast ( c ) in IgMi ( N = 8) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice in draining LNs on day 7 post-inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. d Analysis of tumor growth in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 26) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 30) implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. e , f Tumor sizes and weights on day 20 post-inoculation (DPI 20). In ( f ) N = 7 for Prdm1 fl/fl and 8 for Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups. g , h Representative flow <t>cytometry</t> plots and frequencies of GC B cells (( g ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 7 vs 7, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 9 vs 9) or plasma cells (( h ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 2 vs 2, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 7 vs 7) in LNs on day 7, 18, 27 post inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. i , j Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating IFNγ + CD8 T cells ( i ) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells ( j ) from Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 6) on DPI 7. k , l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating exhausted CD8 T cells (( k ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 7)) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells (( l ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 12) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9)) on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data ( b , c and g – l ) were from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , c , f – l ) represents the value obtained in an independent mouse. Bars are presented as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , c , f , g and i – l ), Two-way ANOVA ( a , d , g and h ) and exact p value shown in figures. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Flow Cytometry Sony Sa3800 Spectral Cell Analyser, supplied by Sony, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/flow cytometry sony sa3800 spectral cell analyser/product/Sony
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    flow cytometry sony sa3800 spectral cell analyser - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Sony fp7000 spectral flow cytometry
    A summary of the state-of-the-art instruments of flow cytometry, worldwide and within China.
    Fp7000 Spectral Flow Cytometry, supplied by Sony, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fp7000 spectral flow cytometry/product/Sony
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fp7000 spectral flow cytometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Tumor growth in IgMi mice. IgMi or C57BL/6 mice were s.c. implanted with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Tumor growth curves were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b , c Shown are frequencies of GC B cells ( b ) in IgMi ( N = 9) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice and frequencies of plasmablast ( c ) in IgMi ( N = 8) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice in draining LNs on day 7 post-inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. d Analysis of tumor growth in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 26) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 30) implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. e , f Tumor sizes and weights on day 20 post-inoculation (DPI 20). In ( f ) N = 7 for Prdm1 fl/fl and 8 for Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups. g , h Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of GC B cells (( g ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 7 vs 7, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 9 vs 9) or plasma cells (( h ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 2 vs 2, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 7 vs 7) in LNs on day 7, 18, 27 post inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. i , j Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating IFNγ + CD8 T cells ( i ) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells ( j ) from Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 6) on DPI 7. k , l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating exhausted CD8 T cells (( k ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 7)) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells (( l ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 12) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9)) on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data ( b , c and g – l ) were from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , c , f – l ) represents the value obtained in an independent mouse. Bars are presented as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , c , f , g and i – l ), Two-way ANOVA ( a , d , g and h ) and exact p value shown in figures. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Blocking plasma cell fate enhances antigen-specific presentation by B cells to boost anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59622-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Tumor growth in IgMi mice. IgMi or C57BL/6 mice were s.c. implanted with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Tumor growth curves were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b , c Shown are frequencies of GC B cells ( b ) in IgMi ( N = 9) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice and frequencies of plasmablast ( c ) in IgMi ( N = 8) vs C57BL/6 ( N = 8) mice in draining LNs on day 7 post-inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. d Analysis of tumor growth in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 26) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 30) implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. e , f Tumor sizes and weights on day 20 post-inoculation (DPI 20). In ( f ) N = 7 for Prdm1 fl/fl and 8 for Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups. g , h Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of GC B cells (( g ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 7 vs 7, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 9 vs 9) or plasma cells (( h ); respective numbers of mice analyzed for Prdm1 fl/fl vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre groups were as follows: D7: 2 vs 2, D18: 8 vs 8, D27: 7 vs 7) in LNs on day 7, 18, 27 post inoculation of MC38 tumor cells. i , j Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating IFNγ + CD8 T cells ( i ) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells ( j ) from Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 6) on DPI 7. k , l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating exhausted CD8 T cells (( k ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 7)) or IFNγ + CD4 T cells (( l ); Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 12) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9)) on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data ( b , c and g – l ) were from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , c , f – l ) represents the value obtained in an independent mouse. Bars are presented as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , c , f , g and i – l ), Two-way ANOVA ( a , d , g and h ) and exact p value shown in figures. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: All samples were acquired on BD LSR2 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), or Aurora spectral flow cytometry (Cytek Biosciences) and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (v10).

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Clinical Proteomics, Two Tailed Test

    a , b Analysis of tumor growth in MD4+ ( N = 18) and non-transgeneic MD4− ( N = 17) littermate mice implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 B16F10 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b Tumor sizes (left) and weights (right) on DPI 19. c , d Accelerated growth of MC38 tumors in MD4 mice. MD4+ ( N = 17) and MD4− ( N = 17) mice were implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 2 independent experiments. d Tumor sizes (left) and weights (right) on DPI 19. e Histogram comparison of membrane-bound HEL (mHEL) expression in B16F10-mHEL and control B16F10 cells. f , g Analysis of tumor growth in MD4+ and MD4− mice implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 control B16F10 cells (B16F10-Ctrl) or with B16F10 cells stably expressing membrane-bound HEL (B16F10-mHEL). Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. g Tumor sizes (left) and weights (right) on DPI 20. h Representative flow cytometry plots, number and frequency of GC B cells in draining LNs of MD4+ mice implanted with B16F10-mHEL or B16F10-Ctrl cells on DPI 18. i , j Frequency and number of activated CD86 + MHC-II + B cells ( i ) and CD80 + MHC-II + B cells ( j ) in draining LNs on DPI 18. k Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD80 + MHC-II + B cells, and CD80 expression on CD19 + MHC-II + B cells on DPI 18. l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD86 + MHC-II + B cells, and CD86 expression on CD19 + MHC-II + B cells on DPI 18. m Proportion and number of plasma cells in draining LNs on DPI 18. n ELISA measurement of anti-HEL antibody in serum of MD4+ mice on DPI 18 of B16F10-mHEL or B16F10-Ctrl tumor cells. Each point in graphs ( b , d , g , h – n ) represents value obtained in an individual mouse. Flow cytometry and ELISA data were pooled from 3 independent experiments. Bars show mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , d , g , h – n ), two-tailed unpaired multiple t -tests with Holm–Sidak’s correction ( a , c , f ) and exact p value shown. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Blocking plasma cell fate enhances antigen-specific presentation by B cells to boost anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59622-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Analysis of tumor growth in MD4+ ( N = 18) and non-transgeneic MD4− ( N = 17) littermate mice implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 B16F10 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b Tumor sizes (left) and weights (right) on DPI 19. c , d Accelerated growth of MC38 tumors in MD4 mice. MD4+ ( N = 17) and MD4− ( N = 17) mice were implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 MC38 tumor cells per mouse. Data were pooled from 2 independent experiments. d Tumor sizes (left) and weights (right) on DPI 19. e Histogram comparison of membrane-bound HEL (mHEL) expression in B16F10-mHEL and control B16F10 cells. f , g Analysis of tumor growth in MD4+ and MD4− mice implanted s.c. with 1 × 10 6 control B16F10 cells (B16F10-Ctrl) or with B16F10 cells stably expressing membrane-bound HEL (B16F10-mHEL). Data were pooled from 5 independent experiments. g Tumor sizes (left) and weights (right) on DPI 20. h Representative flow cytometry plots, number and frequency of GC B cells in draining LNs of MD4+ mice implanted with B16F10-mHEL or B16F10-Ctrl cells on DPI 18. i , j Frequency and number of activated CD86 + MHC-II + B cells ( i ) and CD80 + MHC-II + B cells ( j ) in draining LNs on DPI 18. k Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD80 + MHC-II + B cells, and CD80 expression on CD19 + MHC-II + B cells on DPI 18. l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD86 + MHC-II + B cells, and CD86 expression on CD19 + MHC-II + B cells on DPI 18. m Proportion and number of plasma cells in draining LNs on DPI 18. n ELISA measurement of anti-HEL antibody in serum of MD4+ mice on DPI 18 of B16F10-mHEL or B16F10-Ctrl tumor cells. Each point in graphs ( b , d , g , h – n ) represents value obtained in an individual mouse. Flow cytometry and ELISA data were pooled from 3 independent experiments. Bars show mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , d , g , h – n ), two-tailed unpaired multiple t -tests with Holm–Sidak’s correction ( a , c , f ) and exact p value shown. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: All samples were acquired on BD LSR2 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), or Aurora spectral flow cytometry (Cytek Biosciences) and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (v10).

    Techniques: Comparison, Membrane, Expressing, Control, Stable Transfection, Flow Cytometry, Clinical Proteomics, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Two Tailed Test

    a Effect of anti-MHC-II blockade on MC38 tumor growth was assessed by treating Prdm1 fl/fl and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice with anti-MHC-II antibody or IgG2b control on days 0, 3, 7, 10, 13, 16 post inoculation (the days of injection indicated with black arrows); data were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of CD80 + MHC-II + B cells in draining LNs of Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre ( N = 7) mice on DPI 7. c CD80 expression on CD19 + MHC-II + B cells in draining LNs on DPI 7. d Frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD80 + MHC-II + B cells in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre ( N = 6) mice on DPI 27. e CD80 expression on tumor-infiltrating CD19 + MHC-II + B cells on DPI 27. f Frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD86 + MHC-II + B cells in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre ( N = 6) mice on DPI 27. g CD86 expression on tumor-infiltrating CD19 + MHC-II + B cells on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data are from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b – g ) represents an individual mouse. Bars show mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b – g ), two-tailed unpaired multiple t -tests with Holm–Sidak’s correction ( a ) with exact p values shown. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Blocking plasma cell fate enhances antigen-specific presentation by B cells to boost anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59622-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Effect of anti-MHC-II blockade on MC38 tumor growth was assessed by treating Prdm1 fl/fl and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice with anti-MHC-II antibody or IgG2b control on days 0, 3, 7, 10, 13, 16 post inoculation (the days of injection indicated with black arrows); data were pooled from 2 independent experiments. b Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of CD80 + MHC-II + B cells in draining LNs of Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre ( N = 7) mice on DPI 7. c CD80 expression on CD19 + MHC-II + B cells in draining LNs on DPI 7. d Frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD80 + MHC-II + B cells in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre ( N = 6) mice on DPI 27. e CD80 expression on tumor-infiltrating CD19 + MHC-II + B cells on DPI 27. f Frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD86 + MHC-II + B cells in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 7) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre ( N = 6) mice on DPI 27. g CD86 expression on tumor-infiltrating CD19 + MHC-II + B cells on DPI 27. Flow cytometry data are from at least 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b – g ) represents an individual mouse. Bars show mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b – g ), two-tailed unpaired multiple t -tests with Holm–Sidak’s correction ( a ) with exact p values shown. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: All samples were acquired on BD LSR2 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), or Aurora spectral flow cytometry (Cytek Biosciences) and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (v10).

    Techniques: Control, Injection, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

    a On day 18 post-MC38 inoculation, representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of CD9 + CD148 + B cells in tumors. b Elevated frequency of CD9 + CD148 + TIL-Bs in Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre compared to Prdm1 fl/fl mice, N = 10/group. c Analysis of expression of CD20, IgD, IgM, CD73, PD-L2, and CD80 on d18 CD9 + CD148 + TIL-Bs in Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice. d Representative flow cytometry plots and quantification of CD9 + CD148 + B cells of Prdm1 fl/fl mice ( N = 8) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9) in draining LNs on DPI 18. e CD73, PDL2 and CD80 expression on tumor-infiltrating or on draining LNs CD9 + CD148 + B cells at DPI 18 in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 8) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice (N = 9). f Frequency and number of CD9 + CD148 + B cells in draining LNs (left and middle) and the proportion of tumor-infiltrating CD9 + CD148 + B cells (right) in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 14) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 12) on DPI 7. Flow cytometry data are from 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , d – f ) represents an individual mouse. Bars show mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , d and f ), ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test ( e ) with exact p value shown, and n.s. denote P > 0.05. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Blocking plasma cell fate enhances antigen-specific presentation by B cells to boost anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59622-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a On day 18 post-MC38 inoculation, representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of CD9 + CD148 + B cells in tumors. b Elevated frequency of CD9 + CD148 + TIL-Bs in Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre compared to Prdm1 fl/fl mice, N = 10/group. c Analysis of expression of CD20, IgD, IgM, CD73, PD-L2, and CD80 on d18 CD9 + CD148 + TIL-Bs in Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice. d Representative flow cytometry plots and quantification of CD9 + CD148 + B cells of Prdm1 fl/fl mice ( N = 8) and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 9) in draining LNs on DPI 18. e CD73, PDL2 and CD80 expression on tumor-infiltrating or on draining LNs CD9 + CD148 + B cells at DPI 18 in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 8) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice (N = 9). f Frequency and number of CD9 + CD148 + B cells in draining LNs (left and middle) and the proportion of tumor-infiltrating CD9 + CD148 + B cells (right) in Prdm1 fl/fl ( N = 14) vs Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice ( N = 12) on DPI 7. Flow cytometry data are from 3 independent experiments. Each point in graphs ( b , d – f ) represents an individual mouse. Bars show mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with two-tailed unpaired t -test ( b , d and f ), ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test ( e ) with exact p value shown, and n.s. denote P > 0.05. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: All samples were acquired on BD LSR2 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), or Aurora spectral flow cytometry (Cytek Biosciences) and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (v10).

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

    a C57BL/6 and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice were implanted with MC38 and given drinking water containing 0%, 0.4%, or 0.8% VPA from day 0. b Tumor weights. c Frequency and number of plasma cells in draining LNs of VPA-treated mice on day 27 post-MC38 inoculation. d Proportion and number of GCB in draining LNs on DPI 18, N = 13, no VPA; N = 11, 0.8% VPA. e Number of activated CD80 + MHC-II + B cells ( N = 10) and CD86 + MHC-II+ ( N = 13, no VPA; N = 11, 0.8% VPA) B cells in draining LNs on DPI 18. f On DPI 18, frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD80 + MHC-II + B cells, N = 13, no VPA; N = 11, 0.8% VPA, and CD80 expression on CD19 + MHC-II + TIL-B cells, N = 11/group. g Proportion of CD86 + MHC-II + B cells and CD86 level on CD19 + MHC-II + B cells within tumors. h Representative flow plots and frequency of CD9 + CD148 + TIL-B cells on DPI 18, N = 10. i Number and proportion of CD9 + CD148 + B cells in draining LNs on DPI 18, N = 5, no VPA; N = 7, 0.8% VPA. j Percentage of Treg cells within tumors on DPI 18. k Proportion of tumor-effector CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells and NK cells on DPI 18, N = 14, no VPA; N = 12, 0.8% VPA. l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD11b + F4/80+ macrophages on DPI 18, N = 11, no VPA; N = 9, 0.8% VPA. m Ratio of CD86 + M1 macrophages and CD206 + M2 macrophages in tumor on DPI 18, N = 16, no VPA; N = 14, 0.8% VPA. n , o Analysis of tumor growth in C57BL/6, Jh −/− JCk −/ − mice, or Rag1 − /− mice implanted with MC38 ( n ) or B16F10 ( o ) tumor cells and given 0% or 0.8% VPA from day 0. p Spontaneous tumor growth in MMTV-PyMT mice treated with VPA. Water containing 0% or 0.8% VPA was provided starting at age of 6 weeks until experimental endpoints. Data were from 2 independent experiments ( n , o ). Flow cytometry data were from 2 to 3 independent experiments, and each dot in graphs ( b – m ) represents an individual mouse. Bars show mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test (b– m ), two-tailed unpaired multiple t -tests with Holm–Sidak’s correction ( a , n – p ), p values shown, n.s. denotes P > 0.05.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Blocking plasma cell fate enhances antigen-specific presentation by B cells to boost anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59622-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a C57BL/6 and Prdm1 fl/fl CD19cre mice were implanted with MC38 and given drinking water containing 0%, 0.4%, or 0.8% VPA from day 0. b Tumor weights. c Frequency and number of plasma cells in draining LNs of VPA-treated mice on day 27 post-MC38 inoculation. d Proportion and number of GCB in draining LNs on DPI 18, N = 13, no VPA; N = 11, 0.8% VPA. e Number of activated CD80 + MHC-II + B cells ( N = 10) and CD86 + MHC-II+ ( N = 13, no VPA; N = 11, 0.8% VPA) B cells in draining LNs on DPI 18. f On DPI 18, frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD80 + MHC-II + B cells, N = 13, no VPA; N = 11, 0.8% VPA, and CD80 expression on CD19 + MHC-II + TIL-B cells, N = 11/group. g Proportion of CD86 + MHC-II + B cells and CD86 level on CD19 + MHC-II + B cells within tumors. h Representative flow plots and frequency of CD9 + CD148 + TIL-B cells on DPI 18, N = 10. i Number and proportion of CD9 + CD148 + B cells in draining LNs on DPI 18, N = 5, no VPA; N = 7, 0.8% VPA. j Percentage of Treg cells within tumors on DPI 18. k Proportion of tumor-effector CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells and NK cells on DPI 18, N = 14, no VPA; N = 12, 0.8% VPA. l Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD11b + F4/80+ macrophages on DPI 18, N = 11, no VPA; N = 9, 0.8% VPA. m Ratio of CD86 + M1 macrophages and CD206 + M2 macrophages in tumor on DPI 18, N = 16, no VPA; N = 14, 0.8% VPA. n , o Analysis of tumor growth in C57BL/6, Jh −/− JCk −/ − mice, or Rag1 − /− mice implanted with MC38 ( n ) or B16F10 ( o ) tumor cells and given 0% or 0.8% VPA from day 0. p Spontaneous tumor growth in MMTV-PyMT mice treated with VPA. Water containing 0% or 0.8% VPA was provided starting at age of 6 weeks until experimental endpoints. Data were from 2 independent experiments ( n , o ). Flow cytometry data were from 2 to 3 independent experiments, and each dot in graphs ( b – m ) represents an individual mouse. Bars show mean ± SEM. P values were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t -test (b– m ), two-tailed unpaired multiple t -tests with Holm–Sidak’s correction ( a , n – p ), p values shown, n.s. denotes P > 0.05.

    Article Snippet: All samples were acquired on BD LSR2 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), or Aurora spectral flow cytometry (Cytek Biosciences) and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (v10).

    Techniques: Clinical Proteomics, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Two Tailed Test

    A summary of the state-of-the-art instruments of flow cytometry, worldwide and within China.

    Journal: Biosensors

    Article Title: Recent Developments (After 2020) in Flow Cytometry Worldwide and Within China

    doi: 10.3390/bios15030156

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A summary of the state-of-the-art instruments of flow cytometry, worldwide and within China.

    Article Snippet: FP7000 [ ] , Sony , Spectral Flow Cytometry , 6 lasers and 182 detectors.

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Imaging, Virus